⚠️ This is an educational and exploratory tool. Alignment risk assessments are subjective and based on current AI safety research. Consult AI safety experts for serious risk assessment.
Alignment Risk Factors
0% = Narrow AI, 50% = Human-level AGI, 100% = Superintelligence
0% = No alignment, 40% = RLHF, 70% = Constitutional AI, 100% = Full interpretability
0% = No oversight, 30% = Human review, 70% = Automated oversight, 100% = Multi-layer oversight
0% = Cautious phased rollout, 60% = Normal deployment, 100% = Rushed competitive deployment
Frequently Asked Questions
What is AI alignment? AI alignment is the challenge of ensuring that advanced AI systems pursue goals that are beneficial to humanity — even as they become more capable. It involves technical methods like RLHF, Constitutional AI, and interpretability research.
What factors increase alignment risk? Higher model capability, weaker alignment methods, inadequate oversight, and rushed deployment all increase alignment failure probability. The risk compounds when multiple factors are unfavorable.
What are the main alignment methods? Key methods include RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback), Constitutional AI (self-supervision based on principles), mechanistic interpretability (understanding model internals), and scalable oversight (using AI to supervise AI).
How accurate is this calculator? This is a simplified model for educational purposes. Real alignment risk depends on many factors not captured here, including specific model architectures, training data, and deployment context.
P(doom) Calculator
Estimate the probability of AI-related existential catastrophe using Bayesian decomposition.
Try Calculator →AI Job Displacement Risk
Estimate your role's AI automation risk and calculate your financial runway to adapt.
Try Calculator →Investment Calculator
Calculate compound interest and growth projections for your investments over time.
Try Calculator →